Comrades, let me ask, why am I here today?
What do I represent to do with your goodthinking? Are the principles of good
and ungood in the Dec of Ind to all comrades? And am I to speak our good to the
comrades, and to plusspeak our plusgood, and doubleplusspeak our doubleplusgood
given by Big Brother?
Would to Big Brother, for comrade’s sakes and
ours, that the unblackwhite could answer questions. Then the bellyfeel would be
easy. For what comrade does not duckspeak? For what comrade is so ungood that
one would not see the good in Big Brother? For what comrade is so duckspeakwise
ungood that one would not give his voice to speak doubleplusgood of Big
Brother? I am not that comrade. In a case like that, the ungood comrade should
free their facecrime and thoughtcrime.
But this is not the report. I say it with a ungood
sense of a gap between comrades. I will not duckspeak against our glorious Big
Brother! Your high ind only demonstrates the doubleplusbig gap between us. The
crimethink in which you crimethinkers act upon are not good to other comrades.
The full praise of ungood, plusungood, doubleplusungood, and ind passwise down
by your fathers is shared by you, not by me other comrades. This Fort of Ju is
yours, doubleplusungood comrade, not mine. You may show unbellyfeel, I must
show bellyfeel. To drag a comrade into the doubleplusungood act of crimethink,
and call upon him to join you in doubleplusungood acts, were incomrade ungood
and doubleplusungood. Do you mean, comrades, to crimethink, by asking me to speak
today? If so, there is more doubleplusungood to your acts than once thought.
And let me say to you, that it is ungood to copy the example of a nation
(Eurasia) whose crimethinks, building up tall, were shut down by the act of the
Big Brother, burying that nation in doubleplusungood ruin.